# Different Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics

I'll start with a generic perspective, and then I'll apply it to the question about Hilbert space. Here's the generic perspective:

Sometimes we use one mathematical thing to represent another mathematical thing. Here, a

**representation**is a mapping from $A$ to $B$ that preserves the essential structure of $A$, where $A$ and $B$ are both mathematical things.In physics, we also use another type of representation: a mapping from physical things to mathematical things. To define a mathematical model of a physical system, we need to provide this second type of representation.

## Hilbert spaces and their (math-to-math) representations

A Hilbert space is a vector space over the complex numbers $\mathbb{C}$, equipped with a positive-definite inner product and satisfying a completeness condition. That's all. In fact:

For any given finite $N$, all $N$-dimensional Hilbert spaces over $\mathbb{C}$ are isomorphic to each other: they're all the

*same*as far as their abstract Hilbert-space-ness is concerned.When the number of dimensions is not finite, quantum theory requires the Hilbert space to be

**separable**, meaning that it has a countable orthonormal bases. Once again, all infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert spaces over $\mathbb{C}$ are isomorphic to each other: they're all the*same*as far as their abstract Hilbert-space-ness is concerned.

We can *represent* (math-to-math) a Hilbert space using matrices, or using Fock spaces, or using single-variable functions, or using seventeen-variable functions, or whatever. Those representations introduce extra structure that is superfluous as far as the Hilbert-space-ness is concerned, but such representations can still be useful. In particular, different representations can simplify the task of describing different linear operators on the Hilbert space. In quantum theory, the linear operators on a Hilbert space are more important than the Hilbert space itself.

## The physics-to-math representation

The thing that makes a given quantum model interesting is how it represents measurable things in terms of linear operators on a Hilbert space. The word **observable** is used for both sides of this physics-to-math mapping.

Consider these two models:

The usual quantum mechanics of a single non-relativistic spinless particle, with a Hamiltonian of the form $H=P^2/2m + V(X)$, where $P$ is the momentum observable and $X$ is the position observable.

Quantum chromodynamics (QCD). By the way, QCD can be rigorously well-defined by treating space as a discrete lattice, so it's mathematically legit.

Both of these models use the same abstract Hilbert space, namely the one-and-only infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space over the complex numbers. The two models are different, though, because they describe different (simplified) worlds that have different types of measurable things. QCD does not have position observables, and single-particle quantum mechanics does not have Wilson-loop observables. Even if we only consider the association between observables and spacetime, QCD and single-particle QM are *still* very different: the pattern of observables in QCD is Lorentz-symmetric (to a good approximation at resolutions much coarser than the lattice spacing) and the pattern of observables in single-particle QM is not.

Sometimes physicists use the term "Hilbert space" to mean a particular representation (math-to-math) of the Hilbert space along with a particular set of observables (physics-to-math) suggested by that representation. I personally prefer to reserve the term "Hilbert space" for the abstract mathematical thing (neither type of representation), because I think that's more clear. Preferences aside, the important message is that models are not distinguished from each other by their abstract Hilbert spaces or by how those Hilbert spaces are represented in the math-to-math sense. Instead, different models are distinguished from each other by their *observables* — by the physics-to-math mapping from measurable things to linear operators on the Hilbert space.