Why #if 0 vs #if (1 > 1)?

Both expressions are false, so the code is never compiled.

Here are potential explanations for why the programmer did not want to use the obvious #if 0 preprocessor directive to disable a section of code:

• the programmer did not want grep '#if 0' to find his code snippet.
• the local coding conventions disallow #if 0 and possibly enforce this rule with a script. The programmer found a contorted workaround.
• some programmer's editors (eg vim) colorize #if 0 sections as comments, using a different preprocessor expression defeats this.
• the programmer might have thought a boolean expression was required after #if. The use of parentheses supports this explanation, but only the programmer can tell.
• the original code had #if (OPTION > 1) and OPTION was changed to 1 with a sed script or some other global text replacement method.
• the programmer may have wanted to attract the next reader's attention. Either for a humorous purpose or some other obscure goal. Goal achieved in this case.
• as noted in some of the comments, this could be a lame attempt at obfuscating the code, to increase job security... For this purpose, I suggest the gets operator: #if (0 <- 1) or the crawling adder: #if (1 <~~ 1).

I think the the (1 > 1) acts as a comment for the reader. It is a smiley or some other emoticon! :-)

It would also have been possible to write (0>0) or similar.