Swift Increment through Enum

Update Starting with Swift 4.2 you can make use of the newly added support CaseIterable protocol, which adds compiler support for generating a list of all cases for an enum. Though @ninestones's comment pointed put that we are not guaranteed for allCases to return the cases in the same order as defined, the synthesized implementation does this, and it's unlikely that definition will change.

Your enum could then look something like this (no more hardcoded start value):

enum CopyState: CaseIterable {
    case binary, hex, both

    mutating func next() {
        let allCases = type(of: self).allCases
        self = allCases[(allCases.index(of: self)! + 1) % allCases.count]
    }
}

You can make this piece of functionality available to all CaseIterable enums:

extension CaseIterable where Self: Equatable {
    mutating func next() {
        let allCases = Self.allCases
        // just a sanity check, as the possibility of a enum case to not be
        // present in `allCases` is quite low
        guard let selfIndex = allCases.index(of: self) else { return }
        let nextIndex = Self.allCases.index(after: selfIndex)
        self = allCases[nextIndex == allCases.endIndex ? allCases.startIndex : nextIndex]
    }
}

enum CopyState: CaseIterable {
    case binary, hex, both
}

var state = CopyState.hex
state.next()
print(state) // both
state.next()
print(state) // binary

Or, a little bit more verbose, but with a better separation of concerns:

extension Collection {
    // adding support for computing indexes in a circular fashion
    func circularIndex(after i: Index) -> Index {
        let nextIndex = index(after: i)
        return nextIndex == endIndex ? startIndex : nextIndex
    }
}

extension Collection where Element: Equatable {
    // adding support for retrieving the next element in a circular fashion
    func circularElement(after element: Element) -> Element? {
        return index(of: element).map { self[circularIndex(after: $0)] }
    }
}

// Protocol to allow iterating in place (similar to a type conforming to both Sequence and IteratorProtocol)
protocol InPlaceIterable {
    mutating func next()
}

extension InPlaceIterable where Self: CaseIterable, Self: Equatable {
    // adding default implementation for enums
    mutating func next() {
        self = type(of: self).allCases.circularElement(after: self)!
    }
}

// now the enums need only the protocol conformances, they get the
// functionalities for free
enum CopyState: CaseIterable, InPlaceIterable {
    case binary, hex, both
}

---

You could use Int as raw value for your enum (note that this is also the default raw value if you don't specify it), and use it like this:

enum CopyState: Int {
    case binary, hex, both

    mutating func next(){
        self = CopyState(rawValue: rawValue + 1) ?? .binary
    }
}

var state = CopyState.hex
state.next()
print(state) // both
state.next()
print(state) // binary

This works fine as long as you have the raw values of the enum cases in consecutive order. By default the compiler assigns consecutive raw values.

You'd also need to keep in mind to update the next() method if the first case changes, otherwise it will no longer correctly work.

An alternative to the above limitation, suggested by @MartinR, is to force unwrap the raw value zero:

mutating func next(){
    self = CopyState(rawValue: rawValue + 1) ?? CopyState(rawValue: 0)!
}

The above code won't require updating the method when the first enum case changes, however it has the potential of crashing the app if the starting raw value of the enum changes.

Swift doc says

When you’re working with enumerations that store integer or string raw values, you don’t have to explicitly assign a raw value for each case. When you don’t, Swift automatically assigns the values for you.

For example, when integers are used for raw values, the implicit value for each case is one more than the previous case. If the first case doesn’t have a value set, its value is 0.

So this is safe (Swift5)

enum CopyState: Int {
    case binary, hex, both

    mutating func next(){
        self = CopyState(rawValue: rawValue + 1) ?? CopyState(rawValue: 0)!
    }
}