ruby modules and classes same name in structure

Bar can't be a module and a class, they are different things.

Change bar.rb to module Bar or change other_bar.rb to class Bar.

Whichever it is, it has to be consistent. You can't change one to the other. The question is which should it be? If Bar is a container for other classes and only has a few global singleton methods? Then it's a module. But if it can be instantiated, then it's a class.

And yes, you can nest classes. This is totally acceptable:

class Bar
  class OtherBar
    puts "running module Bar with class OtherBar"
  end
end

Bar::OtherBar.new # yay!

Modules and Classes can be nested inside either other in any way you see fit.

---

Edit with some commented examples to help clear this all up:

module Foo

  # Foo::A
  class A
    # simple namespaced class
  end

  # Foo::B, inherits from Foo::A
  class B < A
    # inherting from a class in the same namespace
  end

  # modify Foo::B
  class B
    # When modifying an existing class you don't need to define the superclass
    # again. It will raise an error if you reopen a class and define a different
    # superclass. But leaving it off is fine.
  end

  # nested module Foo::Inner
  module Inner

    # Foo::Inner::C 
    class C
      # simple more deeply namespaced class
    end

    # Foo::Inner::D, inherits from Foo::A
    class D < A
      # inherits from a class in a parent namespace

      # works because ruby looks upward in the nesting chain to find missing constants.
    end

    # Foo::Inner::Foo
    class Foo
      # simple nested class with the same name as something in a parent namespace

      # This is a totally different Foo, because it's in a different namespace
    end

    # Foo::Inner::E, inherits from Foo::Inner::Foo
    class E < Foo
      # class inhereting from another class in the same namespace

      # Foo::Inner::Foo is "closer" than the global Foo, so that gets found as the superclass
    end

    # Foo::Inner::F, which mixes in the gloabl module Foo
    class F
      # the :: constant prefix says to start looking in the global namespace
      # so here we include the top level module Foo, and not the "closer" in namespace Foo::Inner::Foo
      include ::Foo

      # This is an error. This attempts to include the class Foo::Inner::Foo since thats the closest by namespace
      # thing that matches the constant Foo. (you can't include classes, only modules)
      # You need the :: prefix to grab the global Foo module
      include Foo
    end

  end
end

# Z decalred in the global namespace, which inherits from the deeply nested class Foo::Inner::C
class Z < Foo::Inner::C
  # Any class anywhere can inherit from any other class in any namespace.
  # Just drill in!
end

# the following 2 declarations at this point would be identical

# This defines a class deep with in a namespace
class Foo::Inner::Foo::Bar < Foo::A
end

# same as above, but reopens each namespace
module Foo
  module Inner
    class Foo
      class Bar < ::Foo::A
      end
    end
  end
end

Just use class Bar instead of module Bar. In Ruby, classes can be reopened and added to.