Multiple TXT fields for same subdomain
The way described is the way you create multiple records on Route 53.
Entering two values in the textarea separated by a newline will result in two distinct records in the DNS. This is why Amazon call it a "record set" - it is a set of records.
Michael is correct in regards to where your point of confusion is coming from. I'm going to proceed with my usual stuffiness and answer the larger question for those who might happen by from a Google search.
TXTrecords are completely legal per the DNS standards.
TXTrecords implementing a specific standard can potentially be illegal, but only within the scope of that one standard.
- Given the need for multiple standards to coexist and play nicely with other
TXTrecords that share a given name, conflicts are unlikely to happen. It is certainly unlikely that such a requirement would make it into an Internet Standard.
To understand the difference, let's take a look at what the SPF standard (RFC 7208) has to say on the topic:
Starting with the set of records that were returned by the lookup, discard records that do not begin with a version section of exactly "v=spf1". Note that the version section is terminated by either an SP character or the end of the record. As an example, a record with a version section of "v=spf10" does not match and is discarded. If the resultant record set includes no records, check_host() produces the "none" result. If the resultant record set includes more than one record, check_host() produces the "permerror" result.
TXT records which do not meet the syntax requirements of SPF are ignored. An error only occurs in the case where multiple records match SPF syntax.
(DMARC syntax carries the same restriction, for those who might be wondering.)
If you are using
Google Domains, when you edit the
TXT record, there's a plus(+) symbol next to the
TXT value... click that to add multiple values.