Is there a C# equivalent of typeof for properties/methods/members?

No, unfortunately not. It's been discussed and even named: infoof (pronounced "in-foof" for comedy value) but it's not been implemented... yet. Eric Lippert has a blog post about it.

The closest you can come in C# 3 is to make the compiler generate an expression tree, and then pull it out of that - but that's hardly pleasant.

I've just implemented an equivalent of constructions 'propertyof' 'methodof' 'fieldof' using Syste.Linq.Expressions

so instead of writing

var mi = typeof (string).GetMethod("Concat", new[] {typeof (object), typeof (object)});

you can use:

var mi = ReflectionHelper.MethodOf(() => string.Concat(new object(), new object()));

Why do we need this? because now we safe to refactor method, we use via reflection

listing of helper class (you may need to add some informative exceptions in methods):

/// <summary>
/// Represents a set of helpers for .net reflection
///  </summary>
public static class ReflectionHelper
{
    #region Public methods

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a MethodInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="TResult"></typeparam>
    /// <param name="methodExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static MethodInfo MethodOf<TResult>(Expression<Func<TResult>> methodExpression)
    {
        return ((MethodCallExpression)methodExpression.Body).Method;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a MethodInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <param name="methodExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static MethodInfo MethodOf(Expression<Action> methodExpression)
    {
        return ((MethodCallExpression)methodExpression.Body).Method;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a MethodInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <param name="methodExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static MethodInfo MethodOf<TInstance, TResult>(Expression<Func<TInstance, TResult>> methodExpression)
    {
        return ((MethodCallExpression)methodExpression.Body).Method;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a MethodInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <param name="methodExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static MethodInfo MethodOf<TInstance>(Expression<Action<TInstance>> methodExpression)
    {
        return ((MethodCallExpression)methodExpression.Body).Method;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a PropertyInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <param name="propertyGetExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static PropertyInfo PropertyOf<TProperty>(Expression<Func<TProperty>> propertyGetExpression)
    {
        return ((MemberExpression)propertyGetExpression.Body).Member as PropertyInfo;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a PropertyInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <param name="propertyGetExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static PropertyInfo PropertyOf<TInstance, TProperty>(Expression<Func<TInstance, TProperty>> propertyGetExpression)
    {
        return ((MemberExpression)propertyGetExpression.Body).Member as PropertyInfo;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets a FieldInfo object from specified expression
    ///  </summary>
    /// <param name="fieldAccessExpression"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static FieldInfo FieldsOf<TProperty>(Expression<Func<TProperty>> fieldAccessExpression)
    {
        return ((MemberExpression)fieldAccessExpression.Body).Member as FieldInfo;
    }

    //TODO: ConstructorOf(...)

    #endregion //Public methods
}

as I understand we could not use same aproach to getParameterInfo or EventInfo

Another approach to do that, described by Jb Evain, see: http://evain.net/blog/articles/2010/05/05/parameterof-propertyof-methodof?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+jbevain+%28Jb+in+a+nutshell%29

In c# 6 there's still no infoof but there is nameof:

var propertyInfo = typeof(MyClass).GetProperty(nameof(MyClass.MyProperty))

It's certainly not more terse, but at least it's refactoring friendly.