Is metaprogramming possible in Javascript?

No. JavaScript doesn't support this.

But this looks quite good too:

var Result =  from(obj1)
             .as("x")
             .where("x.id=5")
             .groupby("x.status")
             .having(count("x.status") > 5)
             .select("x.status");

although not quite what you wanted, it is possible to write parsers in javascript, and just parse the query (stored as strings) and then execute it. e.g.,using libraries like http://jscc.jmksf.com/ (no doubt there are others out there) it shouldnt be too hard to implement.

but what you have in the question looks great already, i m not sure why you'd want it to look the way you suggested.

Most people insist on trying to metaprogram from inside their favorite language. That doesn't work if the language doesn't support metaprogramming well; other answers have observed that JavaScript does not.

A way around this is to do metaprogramming from outside the language, using program transformation tools. Such tools can parse source code, and carry out arbitrary transformations on it (that's what metaprogramming does anyway) and then spit the revised program.

If you have a general purpose program transformation system, that can parse arbitrary languages, you can then do metaprogramming on/with whatever language you like. See our DMS Software Reengineering Toolkit for such a tool, that has robust front ends for C, C++, Java, C#, COBOL, PHP, and ECMAScript and a number of other programming langauges, and has been used for metaprogramming on all of these.

In your case, you want to extend the JavaScript grammar with new syntax for SQL queries, and then transform them to plain JavaScript. (This is a lot like Intentional Programming) DMS will easily let you build a JavaScript dialect with additional rules, and then you can use its program transformation capabilities to produce the equivalent standard Javascript.

Having said, that, I'm not a great fan of "custom syntax for every programmer on the planet" which is where Intentional Programming leads IMHO.

This is a good thing to do if there is a large community of users that would find this valuable. This idea may or may not be one of them; part of the problem is you don't get to find out without doing the experiment, and it might fail to gain enough social traction to matter.