Is Geoslavery complicity a violation of GISP code of Ethics?

With the code of ethics being a set of guidelines, I think there will be varying interpretations.

For me, I would interpret this sort of coercion as a violation.

IV. Obligations to Individuals in Society
- Avoid undue intrusions into the lives of individuals.

The Federal court here in San Antonio doesn't see a problem with requiring students to wear RFIDs. I guess that absolves GISPs.

A federal judge Tuesday ruled that Northside Independent School District can transfer a student from her magnet school for refusing to wear her student ID badge to protest a new electronic tracking system.

Read more.

Here's more about the RFID technology being used.

Slavery is a well-defined concept that really doesn't need a couple of academics to modify with the "geo" prefix in order to enhance their careers/visibility/whatever . To the extent that "geo-slavery" is actual slavery, then it is illegal in nearly every country in the world. If the sheer repugnance of supporting slavery isn't enough to convince you that it's a violation of any code of ethics, then you have a larger problem than interpreting the GISP code.
If geo-slavery (as in the oxymoronic "voluntary geo-slavery") isn't really slavery, then it's offensive to dilute the meaning of a word that is used to describe people subject to unspeakable conditions.