Iif equivalent in C#

C# has the ? ternary operator, like other C-style languages. However, this is not perfectly equivalent to IIf(); there are two important differences.

To explain the first difference, the false-part argument for this IIf() call causes a DivideByZeroException, even though the boolean argument is True.

IIf(true, 1, 1/0)

IIf() is just a function, and like all functions all the arguments must be evaluated before the call is made. Put another way, IIf() does not short circuit in the traditional sense. On the other hand, this ternary expression does short-circuit, and so is perfectly fine:

(true)?1:1/0;

The other difference is IIf() is not type safe. It accepts and returns arguments of type Object. The ternary operator is type safe. It uses type inference to know what types it's dealing with. Note you can fix this very easily with your own generic IIF(Of T)() implementation, but out of the box that's not the way it is.

If you really want IIf() in C#, you can have it:

object IIf(bool expression, object truePart, object falsePart) 
{return expression?truePart:falsePart;}

or a generic/type-safe implementation:

T IIf<T>(bool expression, T truePart, T falsePart) 
{return expression?truePart:falsePart;}

On the other hand, if you want the ternary operator in VB, Visual Studio 2008 and later provide a new If() operator that works like C#'s ternary operator. It uses type inference to know what it's returning, and it really is an operator rather than a function. This means there's no issues from pre-evaluating expressions, even though it has function semantics.

VB.NET:

If(someBool, "true", "false")

C#

someBool ? "true" : "false";

the ternary operator

bool a = true;

string b = a ? "if_true" : "if_false";