I am confused about using static method in Multithreading java?

I am confusing about:

static method just have only one memory block? if i use static method in multithreading, will it block?

The static keyword in Java simply means "without regard or knowledge of any particular instance of an object."

An instance method can use this to access the fields of its associated instance, but a static method has no associated instance and so this makes no sense.

In multithreading, thread safety involves protecting the consistency and integrity of mutable data. Because objects encapsulate the state of their instance fields, instance methods only need to be concerned about thread safety in those circumstances in which more than one thread will be accessing the same object.

So while thread confinement of an object is a valid thread safety policy for instances of a class, this same reasoning is invalid for static methods because they have no instance.

This has nothing to do with memory blocks at all. It just has to do with access. An object instance is accessed through a reference. If the reference is thread confined, then the object to which that reference points will always be thread safe. But any thread anywhere that can access your class can potentially get to its static members because no reference to an instance is needed to use them.

Static methods are non-blocking by default. You can implement your own synchronization/thread safety policy and have your static method block if you wish.


Each thread has its own stack space, each time a thread calls a method (static or virtual) that call allocates a stack frame, which holds local variables. nothing about this is specific to static methods.

Static methods can be called concurrently by multiple threads, unless you specifically do something to thwart that, such as requiring that the caller acquire a lock (such as using the synchronized keyword).

Static methods are good for cases where there is no shared state. They may be ok in cases accessing or modifying threadsafe shared state, depending on what level of concurrency is needed and how efficient the threadsafe things being accessed are.

Look out for bottlenecks. Putting the synchronized keyword on a static method may be a problem as that limits your application to calling it with only one thread at a time. Alternative strategies including using atomic objects, using threadsafe data structures designed for high concurrency, or using thread confinement may be preferable to locking.