How to implement Enums in Ruby?

I'm surprised that no one has offered something like the following (harvested from the RAPI gem):

class Enum

  private

  def self.enum_attr(name, num)
    name = name.to_s

    define_method(name + '?') do
      @attrs & num != 0
    end

    define_method(name + '=') do |set|
      if set
        @attrs |= num
      else
        @attrs &= ~num
      end
    end
  end

  public

  def initialize(attrs = 0)
    @attrs = attrs
  end

  def to_i
    @attrs
  end
end

Which can be used like so:

class FileAttributes < Enum
  enum_attr :readonly,       0x0001
  enum_attr :hidden,         0x0002
  enum_attr :system,         0x0004
  enum_attr :directory,      0x0010
  enum_attr :archive,        0x0020
  enum_attr :in_rom,         0x0040
  enum_attr :normal,         0x0080
  enum_attr :temporary,      0x0100
  enum_attr :sparse,         0x0200
  enum_attr :reparse_point,  0x0400
  enum_attr :compressed,     0x0800
  enum_attr :rom_module,     0x2000
end

Example:

>> example = FileAttributes.new(3)
=> #<FileAttributes:0x629d90 @attrs=3>
>> example.readonly?
=> true
>> example.hidden?
=> true
>> example.system?
=> false
>> example.system = true
=> true
>> example.system?
=> true
>> example.to_i
=> 7

This plays well in database scenarios, or when dealing with C style constants/enums (as is the case when using FFI, which RAPI makes extensive use of).

Also, you don't have to worry about typos causing silent failures, as you would with using a hash-type solution.

Two ways. Symbols (:foo notation) or constants (FOO notation).

Symbols are appropriate when you want to enhance readability without littering code with literal strings.

postal_code[:minnesota] = "MN"
postal_code[:new_york] = "NY"

Constants are appropriate when you have an underlying value that is important. Just declare a module to hold your constants and then declare the constants within that.

module Foo
  BAR = 1
  BAZ = 2
  BIZ = 4
end
 
flags = Foo::BAR | Foo::BAZ # flags = 3

Added 2021-01-17

If you are passing the enum value around (for example, storing it in a database) and you need to be able to translate the value back into the symbol, there's a mashup of both approaches

COMMODITY_TYPE = {
  currency: 1,
  investment: 2,
}

def commodity_type_string(value)
  COMMODITY_TYPE.key(value)
end

COMMODITY_TYPE[:currency]

This approach inspired by andrew-grimm's answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/5332950/13468

I'd also recommend reading through the rest of the answers here since there are a lot of ways to solve this and it really boils down to what it is about the other language's enum that you care about

I use the following approach:

class MyClass
  MY_ENUM = [MY_VALUE_1 = 'value1', MY_VALUE_2 = 'value2']
end

I like it for the following advantages:

1. It groups values visually as one whole
2. It does some compilation-time checking (in contrast with just using symbols)
3. I can easily access the list of all possible values: just MY_ENUM
4. I can easily access distinct values: MY_VALUE_1
5. It can have values of any type, not just Symbol

Symbols may be better cause you don't have to write the name of outer class, if you are using it in another class (MyClass::MY_VALUE_1)