How can I use a standard ASP.NET session object within ServiceStack service implementation

Using ServiceStack ISession

ServiceStack has a new ISession interface backed by ICacheClient that lets you share same ISession between MVC Controllers, ASP.NET base pages and ServiceStack's Web Services which share the same Cookie Id allowing you to freely share data between these web frameworks.

Note: ISession is a clean implementation that completely by-passes the existing ASP.NET session with ServiceStack's own components as described in ServiceStack's MVC PowerPack and explained in detail in the Sessions wiki page.

To easily make use of ServiceStack's Session (Cache & JSON Serializer) have your Controllers inherit from ServiceStackController (in MVC) or PageBase (in ASP.NET)

There is also new Authentication / Validation functionality added in ServiceStack which you can read about on the wiki:

  • Authentication and authorization
  • Validation

Using ASP.NET Session

Essentially ServiceStack is just a set of lightweight IHttpHandler's running on either an ASP.NET or HttpListener host. If hosted in IIS/ASP.NET (most common) it works like a normal ASP.NET request.

Nothing in ServiceStack accesses or affects the configured Caching and Session providers in the underlying ASP.NET application. If you want to enable it you would need to configure it as per normal in ASP.NET (i.e. outside of ServiceStack) see:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178581.aspx

Once configured you can access the ASP.NET session inside a ServiceStack web service via the singleton:

HttpContext.Current.Session

Or alternatively via the underlying ASP.NET HttpRequest with:

var req = (HttpRequest)base.RequestContext.Get<IHttpRequest>().OriginalRequest;
var session = req.RequestContext.HttpContext.Session;

Although because of the mandatory reliance on XML config and degraded performance by default, I prefer to shun the use of ASP.NET's Session, instead opting to use the cleaner Cache Clients included with ServiceStack.

Basically the way Sessions work (ASP.NET included) is a cookie containing a unique id is added to the Response uniquely identifying the browser session. This id points to a matching Dictionary/Collection on the server which represents the browsers' Session.

The IRequiresSession interface you link to doesn't do anything by default, it simply is a way to signal to either a Custom Request Filter or base web service that this request needs to be authenticated (i.e. two places where you should put validation/authentication logic in ServiceStack).

Here's a Basic Auth implementation that looks to see if a web service is Secure and if so make sure they have authenticated.

Here's another authentication implementation that instead validates all services marked with an [Authenticate] attribute, and how to enable Authentication for your service by adding the Attribute on your Request DTO.

New Authentication Model in ServiceStack

The above implementation is apart of the multi-auth provider model included in the next version of ServiceStack. Here's the reference example showing how to register and configure the new Auth model in your application.

Authentication Strategies

The new Auth model is entirely an opt-in convenience as you can simply not use it and implement similar behaviour yourself using Request Filters or in base classes (by overriding OnBeforeExecute). In fact the new Auth services are not actually built-into ServiceStack per-se. The entire implementation lives in the optional ServiceStack.ServiceInterfaces project and implemented using Custom Request Filters.

Here are different Authentication strategies I've used over the years:

  • Mark services that need authentication with an [Attribute]. Likely the most idiomatic C# way, ideal when the session-id is passed via a Cookie.

  • Especially outside of a Web Context, sometimes using a more explicit IRequiresAuthentication interface is better as it provides strong-typed access to the User and SessionId required for Authentication.

  • You can just have a 1-liner to authenticate on each service that needs it - on an adhoc basis. A suitable approach when you have very few services requiring authentication.


That's a great and comprehensive answer by @mythz. However, when trying to access the ASP.NET session by HttpContext.Current.Session within a ServiceStack web service, it always returns null for me. That's because none of the HttpHandlers within ServiceStack are adorned with the IRequiresSessionState interface, so the .NET Framework does not provide us with the session object.

To get around this, I've implemented two new classes, both of which use the decorator pattern to provide us with what we need.

Firstly, a new IHttpHandler which requires session state. It wraps the IHttpHandler provided by ServiceStack and passes calls through to it...

public class SessionHandlerDecorator : IHttpHandler, IRequiresSessionState {
    private IHttpHandler Handler { get; set; }

    internal SessionHandlerDecorator(IHttpHandler handler) {
        this.Handler = handler;
    }

    public bool IsReusable {
        get { return Handler.IsReusable; }
    }

    public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) {
        Handler.ProcessRequest(context);
    }
}

Next, a new IHttpHandlerFactory which delegates the responsibility for generating the IHttpHandler to ServiceStack, before wrapping the returned handler in our new SessionHandlerDecorator...

public class SessionHttpHandlerFactory : IHttpHandlerFactory {
    private readonly static ServiceStackHttpHandlerFactory factory = new ServiceStackHttpHandlerFactory();

    public IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string requestType, string url, string pathTranslated) {
        var handler = factory.GetHandler(context, requestType, url, pathTranslated);
        return handler == null ? null : new SessionHandlerDecorator(handler);
    }

    public void ReleaseHandler(IHttpHandler handler) {
        factory.ReleaseHandler(handler);
    }

}

Then, it's just a matter of changing the type attributes in the handlers in Web.config to SessionHttpHandlerFactory instead of ServiceStack.WebHost.Endpoints.ServiceStackHttpHandlerFactory, ServiceStack, and your web services should now have the ASP.NET session avaialble to them.

Despite the above, I fully endorse the new ISession implementation provided by ServiceStack. However, in some cases, on a mature product, it just seems too big a job to replace all uses of the ASP.NET session with the new implementation, hence this workaround!


Thanks @Richard for your answer above. I am running a new version of service stack and they have removed the ServiceStackHttpFactory with HttpFactory. Instead of having 

private readonly static ServiceStackHttpHandlerFactory factory = new ServiceStackHttpHandlerFactory();

You need to have 

private static readonly HttpHandlerFactory Factory = new HttpHandlerFactory();

Here is updated code for this service

using ServiceStack;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.SessionState;

namespace MaryKay.eCommerce.Mappers.AMR.Host
{
public class SessionHttpHandlerFactory : IHttpHandlerFactory
{
    private static readonly HttpHandlerFactory Factory = new HttpHandlerFactory();
    public IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string requestType, string url, string pathTranslated)
    {
        var handler = Factory.GetHandler(context, requestType, url, pathTranslated);
        return handler == null ? null : new SessionHandlerDecorator(handler);
    }

    public void ReleaseHandler(IHttpHandler handler)
    {
        Factory.ReleaseHandler(handler);
    }
}

public class SessionHandlerDecorator : IHttpHandler, IRequiresSessionState
{
    private IHttpHandler Handler { get; set; }

    internal SessionHandlerDecorator(IHttpHandler handler)
    {
        Handler = handler;
    }

    public bool IsReusable
    {
        get { return Handler.IsReusable; }
    }

    public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
    {
        Handler.ProcessRequest(context);
    }
}
}

Tags:

Asp.Net

Servicestack

Recent Posts