Does the weak force have an attractive/repulsive force observable in everyday life like the other forces?
In everyday life? Like in your kitchen? No. Or if yes, totally not in the way that you're thinking.
If you insist on thinking of the fundamental interactions in terms of attraction and repulsion, one way to do that is to describe them all in terms of the Yukawa potential energy,
$$ U = \pm \alpha \frac{\hbar c}{r} e^{-r/r_0} $$
where the sign comes from the relative signs of the charges involved and distinguishes attractive from repulsive potentials, the coupling constant $\alpha$ is determined experimentally, and the range parameter
$$ r_0 = \frac{\hbar c}{mc^2} $$
depends on the mass $m$ of the field which mediates the interaction. For gravitation, electromagnetism, and the QCD color force, the this field (graviton, photon, gluon) is massless, so those forces in principle have infinite range. However, in the strong case, the coupling constant $\alpha$ is so large that multi-gluon exchanges are more important than single-gluon exchanges. This strong coupling means that color charges effectively can't be separated from each other, which is known as "color confinement." At low energies and long distances, the effective strong interaction is mediated by a spectrum of massive meson fields, whose own Yukawa potentials conspire to give the nuclei the structure that they have. An attractive force, mediated by pions, acts between nucleons that are separated by a few femtometers, but a repulsive force mediated by heavier mesons makes it expensive for nucleons to approach each other closer than about one femtometer.
For the weak interaction, the charged- and neutral-current bosons both have masses of nearly $100\,\mathrm{GeV}/c^2$. That's three orders of magnitude larger than the pion mass $140\,\mathrm{MeV}/c^2$, which is what mostly defines the size of a nucleon. So in order for nucleons to feel any attraction or repulsion due to the weak force, they would have be substantially "overlapping" in a way that's forbidden by the hard-core repulsion of the residual strong force. The effects of the strong force are much larger than the effects of the weak force --- partially because the coupling constants are different, but partially because the strong force prevents particles from approaching each other close enough that the weak force can affect them very much directly.
This same feature that makes the weak force mostly-irrelevant in nuclei (and more so in electromagnetically-bound systems, where the length scales are longer than in nuclei, and even more so in the even-larger gravitationally-bound systems) also makes the weak interaction harder to measure. In fact, measurements of the weak interaction would be impossible in strongly-interacting systems if the strong and weak interactions had the same set of symmetries, and we would be limited to patiently waiting for weak decays. However, we can take advantage the fact that the weak interaction is the only one of the fundamental forces which changes under mirror reflection.
If there's a way that the weak interaction affects life in your kitchen, it's because the weak interaction is parity-violating and the other fundamental interactions aren't. The Vester-Ulbricht hypothesis suggests a way that parity violation may have been important historically. But it's a much more subtle situation than "X is attracted to Y," because in contests of attraction and repulsion the weak interaction always loses to electromagnetism and the strong force.
The Fermi constant $G_F$ characterizing the weak interactions is half the square of $10^{-18}$m, hence a much shorter characteristic distance than the size of nuclei, or any composite particle.
That is why the weak interactions can help with microscopic decay and species mutation properties of particles, but can hardly amount to collective, coherent, macroscopic effects.
N.B. Aside. The strong force is not that different, in this respect: Even though its range is about a thousand times longer that that of the weak interactions, of the order of fermis, it too has no everyday-life macroscopic consequences not inherent in nuclear structure.